# AIP: Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-timeboost-nova-fee-sweep/28247>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [January 22, 2025, 7:58pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-timeboost-nova-fee-sweep/28247 "2025-01-22T19:58:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 93

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![olimpio](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/olimpio/32/11_2.png) [@olimpio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/olimpio)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2025, 1:39pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-timeboost-nova-fee-sweep/28247/93 "2025-03-31T13:39:49Z")

</div>

> [@olimpio](#):
>
> I voted for in snapshot.

My stance has not changed, I voted FOR on Snapshot (with collect bids in ETH option) and voted FOR on Tally. Timeboost addresses MEV-related challenges without impacting users and creates another revenue stream for the DAO. The Blockworks estimated, “…additional $19m to $95m increase in annual DAO revenue…” is too compelling to ignore. Lower infrastructure burden in current market conditions is also a plus. After reviewing concerns raised by other delegates, I concluded that the benefits of Timeboost outweigh the drawbacks.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-timeboost-nova-fee-sweep/28247)._