# AIP: Whitelist Infura Nova Validator

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-whitelist-infura-nova-validator/25083>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** aip, proposal\
**Created:** [June 21, 2024, 7:24am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-whitelist-infura-nova-validator/25083 "2024-06-21T07:24:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blueweb](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/blueweb/32/6133_2.png) [@Blueweb](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Blueweb)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2024, 6:07am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-whitelist-infura-nova-validator/25083/10 "2024-09-25T06:07:34Z")

</div>

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team.

We welcome adding Infura to the whitelisted validators for Arbitrum Nova.

> [@Argonaut](#):
>
> However, we think it would be beneficial to establish clear criteria and a transparent process for whitelisting validators in the future and a method to avoid these oversights.

We want to raise the point of a transparent process of whitelisting validators and also what the compensation paid for whitelisted validators vs an organisation running the validator without it.

Is there any specific performance uptime for staying whitelisted? Can a whitelisted member be delisted for any particular reasons?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-whitelist-infura-nova-validator/25083)._