# An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [August 16, 2024, 10:33am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386 "2024-08-16T10:33:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![jameskbh](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/jameskbh/32/2667_2.png) [@jameskbh](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/jameskbh)\ **Post date:** [September 30, 2024, 12:22pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/21 "2024-09-30T12:22:48Z")
I voted FOR. Proper information/data is mandatory, and this proposal helps to enhance the one available for ArbitrumDAO. ---
**Author:** ![Frisson](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/frisson/32/2288_2.png) [@Frisson](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Frisson)\ **Post date:** [September 30, 2024, 11:44pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/22 "2024-09-30T23:44:14Z")
I voted For - Use ENS text records on this proposal at the temp check stage. This seems like a valuable way to improve access to Arbitrum DAO data in the ecosystem. I chose the ENS text records option because we should only gate high-risk technical upgrades behind constitutional proposals. ---
**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\ **Post date:** [October 1, 2024, 5:52pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/23 "2024-10-01T17:52:11Z")
I’m voting in favor for the option “FOR - Use ENS txt records”. I think that this proposal is a nice accessibility improvement, it fosters transparency and has no extra costs. Concerning the option, the reason behind my decision is that this will basically make things easier and won’t require an on-chain vote for every single change, which can be time-consuming. At the same time, this option allows changes to be made if the community requires them. ---
**Author:** ![0xDonPepe](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0xdonpepe/32/5989_2.png) [@0xDonPepe](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0xDonPepe)\ **Post date:** [October 1, 2024, 8:45pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/24 "2024-10-01T20:45:37Z")
Just voted in favor of using ENS txt records on Snapshot. EIP-4824 is a solid and useful standard, and it’s great to see it getting implemented on Arbitrum. Having a reliable source for trusted info will definitely help newcomers and anyone diving deeper into Arbitrum. Plus, no additional funding needed for this proposal is a huge bonus. ---
**Author:** ![Tekr0x.eth](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tekr0x.eth/32/2289_2.png) [@Tekr0x.eth](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tekr0x.eth)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 7:43am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/25 "2024-10-02T07:43:45Z")
**Voted For - Use ENS TXT records:** Picking up good practices from other DAOs makes sense. Putting as much info as possible on-chain is necessary for open and transparent governance. I support this kind of standard being adopted by all major DAOs. I agree that we should set the daoURI record on Arbitrum’s ENS. Also, it’s great that this upgrade doesn’t require any payment from the treasury. ---
**Author:** ![Curia](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/curia/32/7751_2.png) [@Curia](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Curia)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 9:16am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/26 "2024-10-02T09:16:14Z")
We are supporting the proposal with the ENS text record option as it aligns with our goal of enhancing the DAO’s accessibility. It’s a straightforward, no-cost solution to improve transparency and accessibility for ArbitrumDAO. ---
**Author:** ![paulofonseca](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/paulofonseca/32/15551_2.png) [@paulofonseca](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/paulofonseca)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 11:50am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/27 "2024-10-02T11:50:39Z")
voting **For – Use registration contract** in the current offchain proposal because this information should be under the control of the DAO not the Arbitrum Foundation. the other option of using “ENS txt records” would update the ENS `arbitrumfoundation.eth` which is not even the name of our DAO, which is “Arbitrum DAO”. Our Arbitrum DAO is not the ENS name `arbitrumfoundation.eth`, it is the set of onchain governor contracts that control our protocol and network, so that’s what should be updated to hold this information. Also, my vote is conditional to the fact that we should use as few dependencies as possible for the _members_ and _proposals_ dynamic URIs, so that the onchain representation of the DAO is not relying on private companies APIs, especially for publicly available onchain governance data. ---
**Author:** ![mcfly](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/mcfly/32/3099_2.png) [@mcfly](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/mcfly)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 2:13pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/28 "2024-10-02T14:13:48Z")
We’re voting FOR the ENS text record option. We definitely need a single source of truth for Arbitrum DAO’s metadata to improve accessibility and tooling integration. It’s a low-risk, no-cost improvement that aligns with best practices in the DAO ecosystem. ---
**Author:** ![PennBlockchain](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/pennblockchain/32/2030_2.png) [@PennBlockchain](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/PennBlockchain)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/29 "2024-10-02T16:29:37Z")
The FranklinDAO / Penn Blockchain Team voted for the **ENS Text Record** option. We chose this option because its streamlined and efficient compared to a Constitutional Proposal. This is beneficial to all delegates and we’re looking forward to the integrations with DeepDAO, ArbScan, Snapshot, etc. ---
**Author:** ![Bob-Rossi](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/bob-rossi/32/873_2.png) [@Bob-Rossi](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Bob-Rossi)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 4:58pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/30 "2024-10-02T16:58:56Z")
Voting “For”, should bring a lot of value. I indicated in the original thread that I would support this, but just voted against for procedural reasons ([Team #6: An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO - #43 by Bob-Rossi](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371/43)) Simply put - this will add value to the DAO at no cost, I don’t really see a reason to vote against. ---
**Author:** ![chamadao](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/chamadao/32/12746_2.png) [@chamadao](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/chamadao)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 5:01pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/31 "2024-10-02T17:01:23Z")
Just voted FOR It’s a simple and effective way to improve access to Arbitrum DAO’s data without needing extra funding or major changes to the existing smart contracts. Plus, it keeps things flexible—using text records allows for easy updates without requiring an on-chain vote every time. This feels like a practical move to help streamline how we manage important DAO information while keeping it transparent and decentralized. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2024, 2:47am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/32 "2024-10-03T02:47:58Z")
We vote for **Use ENS txt records** on Snapshot. This change leads to a better accessibility of the metadata for the toolings in the ecosystem, without additional cost. We believe it’s acceptable to utilize the ENS records for the information. ---
**Author:** ![SEEDGov](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/seedgov/32/14560_2.png) [@SEEDGov](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/SEEDGov)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2024, 1:09pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/33 "2024-10-03T13:09:43Z")
_After consideration, the [@SEEDgov](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/seedgov) delegation has decided to “ **FOR - Use ENS txt records** ” on this proposal at the [Snapshot vote](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x7232f2c1d1da127cb65ee6036fc52ed6fc02540aaf6cf79a3045b6031e819a35)._ ## Rationale As we expressed during the previous vote, we support this initiative as it significantly improves information accessibility, enabling external parties to learn about various DAO details in one centralized location and at no cost to the DAO. However, when selecting between the two options, we opted for the ENS txt records, prioritizing simplicity. Although we generally prefer the DAO to maintain as much autonomy as possible, keeping the information updated could prove challenging without a dedicated manager. ---
**Author:** ![EzR3aL](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ezr3al/32/14760_2.png) [@EzR3aL](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/EzR3aL)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2024, 5:36pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/34 "2024-10-03T17:36:44Z")
I voted YES. Making open and accessible data more transparent with no additional costs is only a a benefit to this industry. ---
**Author:** ![krst](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/krst/32/1357_2.png) [@krst](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/krst)\ **Post date:** [October 3, 2024, 6:15pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/35 "2024-10-03T18:15:14Z")
The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two. We are voting FOR this proposal for the same reasons [we supported it in the past](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371/40). The previous vote for this proposal was defeated simply because of a hiccup in the governance process. The proposal has now followed the proper procedure and has also received a [security review from the ARDC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-daouri-proposal-security-review/26938), which raised no significant concerns. Given that, we see no reason to vote against it. ---
**Author:** ![snowdot](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/snowdot/32/8991_2.png) [@snowdot](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/snowdot)\ **Post date:** [October 4, 2024, 7:07am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/36 "2024-10-04T07:07:16Z")
The results are in for the **An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO** off-chain proposal. See how the community voted and more Arbitrum stats: > **[An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO](https://dhive.io/proposal/1392)** > > Explore An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO proposal, results, votes, and analytics ---
**Author:** ![maxlomu](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/maxlomu/32/1282_2.png) [@maxlomu](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/maxlomu)\ **Post date:** [October 4, 2024, 9:15am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/37 "2024-10-04T09:15:31Z")
gm, voted FOR this proposal. Adding more transparency to our processes is always useful, would be great to understand how many people will actually look into that. Chose the ENS option as the simplest one. ---
**Author:** ![WinVerse](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/winverse/32/10523_2.png) [@WinVerse](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/WinVerse)\ **Post date:** [October 7, 2024, 6:14am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/38 "2024-10-07T06:14:27Z")
DAOplomats voted in favor of this proposal on Snapshot. An _official repository_ of information on the DAO is net-positive and would certainly provide people with a reliable location of verified onchain information. There are no additional costs to the DAO and with the ARDC seeing no issues with it, we were happy to vote in favor. ---
**Author:** ![AbdullahUmar](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/abdullahumar/32/5025_2.png) [@AbdullahUmar](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/AbdullahUmar)\ **Post date:** [October 31, 2024, 11:59pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/39 "2024-10-31T23:59:44Z")
**Below are the opinions of the UADP:** We just wanted to provide transparency regarding why we voted For this proposal. The reasoning essentially stands the same from our previous comment on [this post](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371) but is updated based on proper procedure : > [@Team #6: An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371/50): > > A go-to source of truth is a great idea. We are in favor of setting up a platform like this. At Uniswap, we’ve had experience with managing a couple of ENS subdomains under Uniswap.eth. This was initially set in place in order to give additional use grants to certain deployers who would request the DAO for the ability to deploy Uniswap v3 contracts onto a new EVM. This was only required while there was a BSL in place. Since April of last year, we continued similar record management to have a source of truth regarding the “real” Uniswap v3 contracts on each of the 23 chains that we’re deployed on. This has helped from a security and standardization standpoint. Therefore, exploring record management such as this for Arbitrum is beneficial as well. > > Unfortunately, due to issues surrounding the procedure, we voted against this proposal. We will vote For a revised proposal though. ---
**Author:** ![olimpio](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/olimpio/32/11_2.png) [@olimpio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/olimpio)\ **Post date:** [November 1, 2024, 2:53am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/40 "2024-11-01T02:53:04Z")
Voted for to this proposal. From the two options, chose ENS. This is a good way to manage a single source of truth -“official repository”- for daoURI metadata, and managed by governance, at no additional cost. [Previous page](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386.md?page=1) [Next page](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386.md?page=3)