# An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [August 16, 2024, 10:33am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386 "2024-08-16T10:33:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 35

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![krst](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/krst/32/1357_2.png) [@krst](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/krst)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2024, 6:15pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386/35 "2024-10-03T18:15:14Z")

</div>

The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.

We are voting FOR this proposal for the same reasons [we supported it in the past](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371/40).

The previous vote for this proposal was defeated simply because of a hiccup in the governance process. The proposal has now followed the proper procedure and has also received a [security review from the ARDC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-daouri-proposal-security-review/26938), which raised no significant concerns. Given that, we see no reason to vote against it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-arbitrum-dao/26386)._
