Up to 1.1m ARB to incentivise the liquidity of a single token is really quite hard to compherend.

Whilst I appreciate the work you are doing with stEUR/agEUR, it really is hard to justify such a large amount for a non-native protocol and on just one single token.

Why does the proposal not take into account any other Arbitrum protocols? Uniswap and a “lending protocol” is disappointing when the entire purpose of this framework is to incentivise Arbitrum builders.

This proposal is a large cost to the DAO that almost entirely generates value just for Angle.

Please could you also detail the incentives and liquidity you have achieved so far for this token? Thanks