# Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [August 20, 2024, 10:50pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441 "2024-08-20T22:50:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 42

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2024, 7:29am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/42 "2024-09-09T07:29:55Z")

</div>

I’m voting in favor of this proposal. Imo the budget is reasonable and it allows the Procurement Committee to pursue the work they have been doing for the past months.  
Concerning the automatic re-election of members, I’ve already expressed my opinion in favor in a past comment on the forum ([Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - #21 by 0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/21))

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441)._