# Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [August 20, 2024, 10:50pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441 "2024-08-20T22:50:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 53
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [September 12, 2024, 3:27am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/53 "2024-09-12T03:27:02Z")
We vote **Yes - Extend** for the proposal on Snapshot. We appreciate all the work and comprehensive report provided for the Phase I and continuous effort to be made by the experienced actors in the area. However, we echo the concerns by other delegates on bigger scopes and higher compensations to each party (2.5x from the one in Phase I). Also, the detailed breakdown of the budget, especially the below part should be explicitly clarified in the proposal. > [@sid\_areta](#): > > We will allocate the $60k equally across each party of the ADPC. I.e., each of Areta, Axis Advisory, and Daimon Legal and their dedicated teams will be allocated $20k each per month. On the election, it makes sense to keep the current members because of the nature of the work that requires speciality and continuity, but as the currently selected members are less motivated to work on elections in the future, we would like to see another party (Entropy or Foundation?) to oversee the process and operations of the election for the next term if possible. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441)._