gm, I voted FOR this proposal, acknowledging that:
- The current committee has delivered an acceptable, though improvable, output.
- Rotating members every six months could limit productivity and efficiency.
However, I would like to challenge the decision to focus on RPC providers for Phase 2.
With the launch of a new Orbit chain, we are currently using the free tier options offered by many providers. Based on my experience, this is sufficient for the early stages of ecosystem development. Chains in a growth phase are better positioned to select from a broader range of providers.
If the goal is to support emerging projects, I believe there are other areas where we could achieve greater impact.
A̶d̶d̶i̶t̶i̶o̶n̶a̶l̶l̶y̶, I̶ w̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ l̶i̶k̶e̶ t̶o̶ s̶e̶e̶ t̶h̶e̶ c̶o̶m̶p̶l̶e̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ o̶f̶ t̶h̶e̶ w̶h̶i̶t̶e̶l̶i̶s̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ p̶r̶o̶c̶e̶s̶s̶ f̶r̶o̶m̶ P̶h̶a̶s̶e̶ 1̶, w̶h̶i̶c̶h̶ h̶a̶s̶ n̶o̶t̶ y̶e̶t̶ b̶e̶e̶n̶ f̶u̶l̶l̶y̶ d̶e̶l̶i̶v̶e̶r̶e̶d̶. EDIT: looks like this has been completed
Thank you.