# Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [August 20, 2024, 10:50pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441 "2024-08-20T22:50:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 79
**Author:** ![0x\_ultra](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0x_ultra/32/236_2.png) [@0x\_ultra](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0x_ultra)\ **Post date:** [October 2, 2024, 5:27pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/79 "2024-10-02T17:27:49Z")
I’m reiterating my choice by voting in favor at this phase too. I’m both satisfied with the past performances and with the goals that have been set for the second phase. I also appreciate the efforts that were made to come up with a detailed explanation of the budget, providing a transparent and large view of their intentions. Concerning the electoral procedure, I already expressed my thoughts here > [@Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/21): > > I’m jumping into the discussion a bit late, but I wanted to share my thoughts on the election - no election topic. Generally, I’m all for elections and democratic principles as they are fundamental to decentralized governance. However, I think it’s also important to consider the context and specifics of the situation. And I agree with @JoJo on this. The initial proposal mentioned that elections would be held for the second phase. But sometimes, to truly understand if certain choices are effec… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441)._