Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal

[Frisson]

I voted FOR this proposal on Tally for the reasons outlined below. I’m comfortable with the team’s approach of focusing on execution only for the events vertical to reduce scope. I still think it’s ambitious to tackle two verticals at once, but am willing to let it play out and observe the results. I’m fine with the re-election of the current ARDC members, as I think continuity will benefit execution.

@Frisson

I appreciate the ADPC’s work during the pilot phase to set up a procurement framework, benchmark security providers, and pass a proposal to fund a security subsidy.

Overall, I think the amount of work proposed in Phase II is ambitious. My instinct is to recommend that we reduce the scope of Work Package 1 by focusing on only the RPC vertical. That way, the team will have more capacity to execute well on Work Packages 2-4. I think we can execute on the event vertical in Phase III.

I plan to spend more time with this proposal to provide additional feedback in the future.