but… your previous post says that this optimistic approval for NOT moving forward is only about the Security Council governors. Not the Core and Treasury Governors.
the original proposal paid Tally to have flexible voting on the Core and Treasury Governors and the DAO is waiting for that to be implemented for more than 600 days at this point. the reasons why Tally decided to propose the implementation of flexible voting in Arbitrum Core and Treasury governor contracts are still valid to this day.
also, as I’ve asked here more than 6 months ago, when are we going to have the ability to cancel onchain proposals during their pending phase, which is the other part of this upgrade that the DAO paid for?