# Arbitrum Partial Delegation and Private Voting Solutions Research

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-partial-delegation-and-private-voting-solutions-research/26638>\
**Category:** Voting Rationale & Governance Calls\
**Tags:** governance\
**Created:** [September 4, 2024, 10:25pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-partial-delegation-and-private-voting-solutions-research/26638 "2024-09-04T22:25:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frisson](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/frisson/32/2288_2.png) [@Frisson](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Frisson)\
**Post date:** [November 27, 2024, 12:18am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-partial-delegation-and-private-voting-solutions-research/26638/3 "2024-11-27T00:18:36Z")

</div>

@CastleCapital Thanks for following up on this research. Tally is still in the consensus building phase around partial delegation and shielded voting. We’re open to moving forward with implementations for either/both, but would want a clear signal that the DAO is aligned with a particular solution.

Per your suggestion, I posted this in the Arbitrum Delegates Telegram group to try to get more eyes on it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-partial-delegation-and-private-voting-solutions-research/26638)._