# Arbitrum Strategic Objective Setting (SOS) – Defining the DAO’s Interim Goals **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [January 10, 2025, 5:45pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-strategic-objective-setting-sos-defining-the-dao-s-interim-goals/28102 "2025-01-10T17:45:49Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 50
**Author:** ![danielM](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/danielm/32/12873_2.png) [@danielM](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/danielM)\ **Post date:** [January 28, 2025, 5:18pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-strategic-objective-setting-sos-defining-the-dao-s-interim-goals/28102/50 "2025-01-28T17:18:53Z")
Thanks, @Entropy , for this proposal. This sounds good. I’m just afraid that there can be too many submissions during the voting period. I hope all delegates will be have enough time for examineting and voting. According to the proposal, once strategic objectives are set, the DAO will track their progress with key results to measure success. It’s mentioned that the ARDC research member will provide quarterly reports to assess how the DAO has progressed and what areas need attention. > [@Entropy](#): > > Every 12 months, the chosen objective set will be reviewed and, if needed, revised based on changing market conditions, the competitive environment, progress made in the past year, etc. In order to keep the DAO up to date with the progress towards each strategic objective, we suggest the research member of the ARDC be tasked with providing quarterly reports assessing how the DAO has improved through proposals and initiatives as well as suggesting what areas require more attention while recommending solutions to address these areas. How the research member of the ARDC will be chosen? Should he be given additional salary for his reports? --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-strategic-objective-setting-sos-defining-the-dao-s-interim-goals/28102)._