# ARDC Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ardc-communication-thread/28279>\
**Category:** ARDC Supervisory Council\
**Created:** [January 27, 2025, 7:48pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ardc-communication-thread/28279 "2025-01-27T19:48:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EzR3aL](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/ezr3al/32/14760_2.png) [@EzR3aL](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/EzR3aL)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2025, 12:12pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ardc-communication-thread/28279/24 "2025-04-09T12:12:21Z")

</div>

Given that we choose a replacement for @Frisson for the MSS we should also onboard someone. So I would propose to onboard the next person in line from the original proposal.

@Juanrah said that workload will increase, he also recently disclosed he joined SeedLatam. So we can be sure he has a lot of work to do for different entities now.

And even if only a few months are left I would rather see no disruptions than a bad term end for the ARDC. And regarding the onboarding time I would assume it wouldn’t need someone so long to onboard.

I prefer we handle both situations the same and not end up in a mess.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ardc-communication-thread/28279)._