First of all, we appreciate the detailed proposal. We don’t believe that the KPI of this proposal is the BAL Emission amount, as mentioned by wavebender above.
Also, in the discussions above, it has been mentioned that Balancer provides stability to volatile pools.
While this may be beneficial for projects with volatile pools, we are not sure if it is a criterion for the success of a DEX. However, it is very valuable that you have listened to the community’s feedback and reduced your grant size. Increasing the Arbitrum TVL in previous months is definitely an achievement.
Considering the RDNT concerns about Balancer’s distribution, we believe that you will make a distribution, and we vote “For” this proposal.