# Castle Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/castle-delegate-communication-thread/27522>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [November 13, 2024, 4:18pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/castle-delegate-communication-thread/27522 "2024-11-13T16:18:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CastleCapital](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/castlecapital/32/16535_2.png) [@CastleCapital](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/CastleCapital)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2025, 9:36am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/castle-delegate-communication-thread/27522/8 "2025-03-17T09:36:45Z")

</div>

# **March 2025 votes**

## **Snapshot votings**

# [TMC’s Proposed Allocations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tmc-s-proposed-allocations/28522)

**Vote: Deploy Stable, Deploy Nothing, Abstain, Deploy Both**

# [GMC’s Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524)

**Vote: FOR**

> [@GMC's Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524/25):
>
> Thank you for taking the lead on this, @Entropy. Balancing the GMC’s mandate with the DAO’s broader mission isn’t an easy task. While the proposed strategy looks solid, we feel it doesn’t fully reflect the DAO’s primary objectives. We believe it’s essential to include Arbitrum-native protocols in this plan without losing sight of safe returns. As you noted in your comment: The GMC should have engaged more closely with Arbitrum-focused protocols, clarifying its appetite for risk. We also agree…

# [[CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-proposal-for-arbitrum-dao-to-register-the-sky-custom-gateway-contracts-in-the-router/28617)

**Vote: FOR**

> [@\[CONSTITUTIONAL\] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-proposal-for-arbitrum-dao-to-register-the-sky-custom-gateway-contracts-in-the-router/28617/16):
>
> hi @SpikeWatanabe.eth We do not see any issues with registering Sky’s Custom Gateway contracts in the Router as long as OffChain Labs and/or the Arbitrum Foundation has given the green light after reviewing and validating the contract audit reports.

## **Tally votings**

# [AIP: Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-timeboost-nova-fee-sweep/28247)

**Vote: FOR**

> [@AIP: Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-timeboost-nova-fee-sweep/28247/44):
>
> We voted in favour of this proposal on Snapshot and have nothing additional to add.

# [Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/request-to-increase-the-stylus-sprint-committee-s-budget/28312)

**Vote: FOR**

> [@Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/request-to-increase-the-stylus-sprint-committee-s-budget/28312/113):
>
> We voted FOR the proposal on Tally based on the clarifications provided on our earlier questions

# [Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167)

**Vote: FOR**

> [@Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167/108):
>
> We maintain our earlier stance and voted in favour of the adoption of timeboost and Nova fee sweep on tally.

# [[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546)

**Vote: AGAINST**

> [@\[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL\] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrum-onboarding-v2-a-governance-bootcamp/27546/144):
>
> Our opinion has not changed and we have decided to vote against on tally.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/castle-delegate-communication-thread/27522)._