# Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** proposal, game-development-and\
**Created:** [March 12, 2024, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368 "2024-03-12T16:37:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 189

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GFXlabs](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/gfxlabs/32/321_2.png) [@GFXlabs](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/GFXlabs)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2024, 12:28pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368/189 "2024-05-31T12:28:53Z")

</div>

> [@Djinn](#):
>
> The 200m on snapshot did not include the operational expenses (which were also updated to reflect more accurate budget assessments as well).

An extra $25m is not a small amount. We think it’s a mistake and against the spirt of open governance to simply add in a discretionary $25m. Even a couple hundred thousand dollars after getting bids or collecting new information would be one thing. But you have added more than 10% to an already enormous cost. This is a very bad look, and has raised alarm bells amongst some investors and community members.

We have voted against this proposal and ask other delegates to defeat this proposal, which is far too expensive.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368)._
