# Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** proposal, game-development-and\
**Created:** [March 12, 2024, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368 "2024-03-12T16:37:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 190

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michigan\_Blockchain](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/michigan_blockchain/32/10900_2.png) [@Michigan\_Blockchain](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Michigan_Blockchain)\
**Post date:** [May 31, 2024, 10:04pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368/190 "2024-05-31T22:04:51Z")

</div>

Michigan Blockchain agrees that the addition of $25M as operating expenses is not a small amount. We still believe gaming is important to catalyze growth on the ecosystem, but have switched our vote from ‘for’ on Snapshot to ‘against’ on Tally because of the reasons outlined by GFXlabs

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368)._