# ChamaDao Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/chamadao-delegate-communication-thread/27256>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Created:** [October 22, 2024, 7:16pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/chamadao-delegate-communication-thread/27256 "2024-10-22T19:16:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chamadao](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/chamadao/32/12746_2.png) [@chamadao](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/chamadao)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2024, 1:44pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/chamadao-delegate-communication-thread/27256/2 "2024-10-28T13:44:13Z")

</div>

# **Sept - Oct**

[Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/27888300053486667232765715922683646778055572080881341292116987136155397805421)

**Platform:** Tally  
**Vote:** For

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> It’s a smart step towards enhancing Arbitrum’s security and governance.

* * *

[[Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator 1](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xaa831b9306c3ec4f4a9b9731e7c445e540e5a24461a79f1166cb8dcdfa692d09)

Platform: Snapshot  
Vote: For

Rationale:

> [@](#):
>
> Great to see the community rallying behind this decision. Infura’s strong track record in blockchain infrastructure gives us confidence that they’ll enhance the stability and reliability of the network.

* * *

[An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x7232f2c1d1da127cb65ee6036fc52ed6fc02540aaf6cf79a3045b6031e819a35)  
**Platform:** Snapshot  
**Vote:** For

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> It’s a simple and effective way to improve access to Arbitrum DAO’s data without needing extra funding or major changes to the existing smart contracts. Plus, it keeps things flexible—using text records allows for easy updates without requiring an on-chain vote every time. This feels like a practical move to help streamline how we manage important DAO information while keeping it transparent and decentralized.

* * *

[Research on context and retention](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x23985f3bb58758f0f43c5248085f6b7f1783c8e205604262336d043558aeca0c)  
**Platform:** Snapshot  
**Vote:** For

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> Based on the answers given by @danielo, we are satisfied, as we had similar concerns to those raised by other delegates.
> 
> The open-source nature and focus on analyzing only public data ensures transparency while minimizing any privacy concerns. We also appreciate the research-driven approach, especially the collaboration with academic institutions, which adds credibility to the analysis.

* * *

[Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/56768509231150680433760428191516666361790213029100482092064768634784370622764)  
**Platform:** Tally  
**Vote:** For

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> In favor of the proposal to upgrade the RARI governance token and transition to the Arbitrum ecosystem. We believe this upgrade will enhance governance accessibility and efficiency for the RARI DAO.

* * *

[Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/78608365328815179822381240433375943106975722017227920505592824878237374730465)

**Platform:** Tally  
**Vote:** Against

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> ChamaDAO is categorically against additional spending for the DAO without clear goals and success criteria, which this proposal does not have.

* * *

[Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xdfe7bf7e5bc227fc06765f37d9d9ecd1371e637b93b574ae4cc4c1d345cd648f)  
**Platform:** Snapshot  
**Vote:** Against

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> We voted against this proposal in line with our strict stance against unnecessary spending within the DAO.

* * *

[Arbitrum Token Swap Pilot Program](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xe41fa9b0999dbd9276f7e4474e575883717020128b80dc6bd27b75ba5bd6420c)  
**Platform:** Snapshot  
**Vote:** Against

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> We voted against this proposal as it falls under our stance against continued unclear and unnecessary spending by the DAO. There are far better ways to encourage continued support of protocols within the ecosystem that would have higher impact for the cost than this token swap proposal.

* * *

[Fund the Stylus Sprint](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/24926593791565028016457688578136747185250074804329950986605484216603582190563)

**Platform:** Tally  
**Vote:** Against

**Rationale:**

> [@](#):
>
> We voted against this proposal, as the deliverables are unclear and costs high. While further technical development in the ecosystem is important, it should be done with clear deliverables and goals.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/chamadao-delegate-communication-thread/27256)._