[Chronos Finance] [FINAL] [STIP - Round 1]

[ZIsBraindead]

@Telaga

sent to you from Dyson

Meaning, Chronos did not contribute to a bug bounty that could have resulted in a large amount of loss for your users?

[Telaga]

Incorrect as I’ve noted above. Dyson and Chronos did not act independently.

[Matt_StableLab]

@Telaga Friendly reminder to complete the following:

@Matt_StableLab

Hello @Telaga,

Now that your application has been marked eligible, please be advised of the remaining steps in the application process to be completed prior to the Review Period Deadline:

@Matt_StableLab

• Review Period Deadline: October 4, 2023 11:59 PM EST

Please complete the following steps required for your application to proceed to Snapshot:

@Matt_StableLab

2. Once feedback is collected, applicants will need to change their application title from [DRAFT] to [FINAL] by the Review Period deadline: October 4, 2023 11:59 PM EST. At that time, all eligible proposals with the following formatted titles will be migrated to Arbitrum Snapshot to vote. The correct format for a proposal ready to move to vote looks like this: [Project Name] [FINAL] [STIP - Round 1].

To change your proposal to final, please tag an Arbitrum Foundation Forum Moderator (@ stonecoldpat @ cliffton.eth @ eli_defi) by the Review Period deadline to notify them of your proposal’s readiness to proceed from [Draft] to [Final] status.

Once notified, the Arbitrum Foundation Forum Moderator will adjust your title from [Draft] to [Final] status. Once marked as [FInal], your application post will be locked by moderators and you will no longer be able to edit your proposal.

[Telaga]

Thanks Matt, final details have been completed

@stonecoldpat @cliffton.eth @eli_defi we are ready to go!

Cheers

[defidaonft]

you haven’t changed the title from [DRAFT] to [FINAL]

[cliffton.eth]

Post has been marked FINAL and locked.

[Telaga]

Hi, as is public knowledge Chronos was funded by a open to all chrNFT community raise
Chronos and Sphere are two entirely different teams

[Telaga]

Great and thank you for that

[ZIsBraindead]

Dyson paid for the bounty in full. If I were on the Chronos team, I would have liked to pay for a bug that could have drained my users’ funds, but clearly, Chronos is more interested in filling their pockets than security.

[ITUblockchain]

We do not support Chronos’s STIP proposal due to its request for incentives for a product that has not yet been live and as can be seen in the forum, its controversial stance in the bug bounty program against white-hat hackers chose bug bounty programs. We believe that within the STIP framework, protocols that are already operating on Arbitrum and have a specific user base would benefit more from this incentive program and would be more beneficial to the ecosystem.