[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 50 Dia

Thanks a lot!!

I got the first answer!

As concerns the second I have read the whole discussion in Ehtereum Magicians and tried to understand the more I could!

I appreciate your direct answer.

Noting a scope change: ArbOS 50 now introduces an “Effective Block Gas Limit,” defined as MaxBlockGasLimit + MaxTxGasLimit. This update has been incorporated into the post above.

Tentative timelines of this AIP were updated based on L1 Client releases on September 26th, and the the updated tentative timeline for L1 Fusaka upgrades provided in All Core Devs Consensus (ACDC) Call #165 held on September 18th, 2025.

1 Like

This looks like a big step forward. I like how ArbOS 50 Dia lines up with Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade while also adding things that directly improve how Arbitrum runs.

The gas limit cap and the efficiency tweaks make a lot of sense, and enabling EIP-2537 feels long overdue.

The Native Mint/Burn feature is also a smart move for Orbit chains. Excited to see how this upgrade smooths things out for both devs and users.

The following reflects the views of GMX’s Governance Committee, and is based on the combined research, evaluation, consensus, and ideation of various committee members.

We value the development progress of ArbOS 50 Dia’s introduction in incorporating Fusaka EIP’s. We approved this proposal, and have no qualms with the most recent changes on activating these changes to both Arbitrum Nova and One.

voted Against on this past offchain vote because there hasn’t been enough discussion on this proposal… it’s way too soon to bring it to a vote.

We have added a new fix to accompany ArbOS50 Version Dia. This forum post has been updated.

did anyone independently validated the payload of this onchain proposal?

specifically, the fact that it only does what both of these two proposals say it should?
https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x33754da4006d0ef38666ec5d5e85fd0966a891a594ab9dc21f23beedea2d330b
https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4a96a91d162975de0d402b83ca8b8a24e808ca357150120fc0d44ae0bf1cc4a5

@offchainlabs @krst et all?

We will be validating it next week.

2 Likes

Thank you!

And just to note that, any vote from delegates that haven’t validated the payload themselves, is a bit irresponsible. Since I can’t validate it myself, I’ll wait for L2BEAT’s assessment before casting my vote.

1 Like

Thanks for raising this. Offchain Labs has independently validated the payload to ensure it matches the intent and scope described in the two Snapshot approvals. For transparency, the payload-generation steps, simulation outputs, and code-diff verification instructions are publicly documented here:

Payload generation + simulation results: https://github.com/ArbitrumFoundation/governance/pull/366

ArbOS 51 code-difference verification guide: https://arbitrum.notion.site/Verifying-the-ArbOS-51-Code-Difference-2a501a3f59f8804cb0a0f9a460020a9d.

We encourage all delegates to perform their own verification.

2 Likes

Voting in favor on tally.
This is a maintenance proposal and making sure Arbitrum can work with future Ethereum updates. Even though I’m not technical, I can see why it matters to keep ArbOS in line with Ethereum and trust offchainlabs execution.

Thank you for the proposal.

Since @offchainlabs validated the payload, I am going to vote. Aligned with all the other ArbOS proposals my vote is going to be FOR. I do not have something important to add here, so I am keeping it short to avoid noise creation.

1 Like

Verified state changes with governance seatbelt, all looks good and consistent with proposal (and matches shared reports here: https://github.com/ArbitrumFoundation/governance/pull/366 )

Voting For

1 Like

Voted yes on both tally and snapshot
I’m supporting this upgrade because it keeps us aligned with Ethereum while adding some smart optimizations for Arbitrum.

I voted FOR as this proposal implements necessary data availability improvements at the protocol level, strengthening Arbitrum’s core infrastructure in line with the DAO’s constitutional process.

I voted FOR this proposal because it improves Arbitrum and keeps it aligned with Ethereum.

voting For on the current onchain vote because this keeps Arbitrum aligned with Ethereum, as it should be.

Voting For as this seems like a no-brainer update to optimize Arbitrum and maintain Ethereum alignment.