Thank you for the proposal
I understand the goal perfectly well and it is supported by everyone - not to lose control
But this can be done in different ways.
The method presented here seems to me to be one of the most problematic:
- At the moment, the cost of the ARB token has fallen to minimum values, several times lower than at its peak, which means that the seizure of control is currently the cheapest (compared to other periods). If earlier it was hundreds of millions of $, now 80 million $ is enough to re-vote everyone.
- Against the background of reduced security, we propose to further reduce the voting threshold for the most important Constitutional votes. At the same time, this is a hypothetical possibility of losing control. In fact, this has not happened yet
In this regard, we can use other methods.
The main one that I propose and which also does not require any changes to the management contracts:
- Delegate 25 million ARB between “trusted” delegates. How to define “trusted” is a debatable issue, but one of the obvious solutions is Karma. Take the top 25/50 delegates, who vote at least 90% to provide a safety cushion.
- However, I do not propose to do this right now. The mechanism itself needs to be developed, but such delegations should be made temporarily, before the constitutional vote, and also only in the event of a failure of the corresponding vote.
- This approach guarantees control over management if necessary and will not reduce security.
- Yes, this is a bad approach in terms of decentralization, but this is a temporary delegation, not a permanent one as in other DAOs)