# Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Tags:** proposal\ **Created:** [June 28, 2024, 2:49am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167 "2024-06-28T02:49:58Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 71
**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/tane/32/3187_2.png) [@Tane](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [September 19, 2024, 1:48am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167/71 "2024-09-19T01:48:00Z")
We support this proposal and vote for “Collect bids in ETH to treasury” on Snapshot. We maintain our stance in [the comment](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167/24) posted before and continue to support the progress of the development of Timeboost. We have also support the adjustments around a few parameters to be adjustable by Offchain Labs to fine-tune the design and achieve the stability, user experience and economics for the Arbitrum DAO. Also, interested in the future improvement partnering with the Espresso team. One question for @Arbitrum (or Offchain Labs), > [@Arbitrum](#): > > The rights described below are expected to only be exercised in circumstances **where doing so would enhance Timeboost’s long-term stability, preserve or improve the user experience for those using Timeboost-enabled Arbitrum chains, increase the security posture, resiliency, or stability of the chain, and/or otherwise help increase revenue for the ArbitrumDAO** How do you make sure of those when modifying the parameters in question? Do you have some kind of A/B test system to try different parameters to evaluate the key metrics? --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167)._