# Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [June 28, 2024, 2:49am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167 "2024-06-28T02:49:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 91

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlockworksResearch](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/blockworksresearch/32/14962_2.png) [@BlockworksResearch](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/BlockworksResearch)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2024, 5:45pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167/91 "2024-09-25T17:45:31Z")

</div>

To further the conversation on the impact Timeboost may have on DAO revenue as well as LPs, we want to point everyone in the direction of an ARDC deliverable we just published.

This was not an explicit ask for Blockworks Research to do, but we felt with the recent discourse/concern around Timeboost, it was important for us to put this out there.

TL:DR - _We estimate that Timeboost could have led to an additional $19m to $95m increase in annual DAO revenue, implying 33-162% growth over the previous twelve months. We believe Timeboost is a net-positive for Arbitrum DAO value capture and that Arbitrum One LPs should still outperform LPs on competing chains. Additionally, we believe the DAO may want to consider a Timeboost Committee to closely monitor Timeboost activity and onchain market conditions, so that it can make informed decisions on adjustments to Timeboost’s parameters in the future._

> [@ARDC Research Deliverables](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ardc-research-deliverables/23438/13):
>
> Timeboost Revenue and LP Impact Analysis The below report is available in document format [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12pXp1r7nR0YCbVlTX7HeyDgyfxMsplbpOW2xt1rxOoE/edit#heading=h.79nw6hr9cnid) Although this was not requested by the DAO advocate for the ARDC, in light of the [Timeboost proposal vote](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167), [Entropy’s request](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/request-for-support-ardc-research-member-comparison-of-mev-solutions-timeboost-mev-boost-fastlane/26117), and the general concern around the impact Timeboost may have on LPs, Blockworks Research has performed an analysis on the revenue projections Timeboost could drive to the DAO, as well as an attempt to explain the impact on DEX LPs. We estimate that Timeboost could have led to a…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-proposal-to-adopt-timeboost-a-new-transaction-ordering-policy/25167)._
