# \[Constitutional\] AIP: Ratification of Security Council Election Process Improvements **URL:** \ **Category:** Finalized AIPs\ **Created:** [July 9, 2026, 1:17pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-ratification-of-security-council-election-process-improvements/31048 "2026-07-09T13:17:13Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![Griff](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/griff/32/964_2.png) [@Griff](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Griff)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2026, 4:54pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-ratification-of-security-council-election-process-improvements/31048/2 "2026-07-09T16:54:26Z")
I fully support these changes. My original thoughts are here: > [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: Security Council Election Process Improvements \[OLD\]](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-security-council-election-process-improvements-old/29848/46): > > RE: 2 Year Terms white_check_markAs a current member of the security council and an active delegate that I haven’t experienced fatigue with yearly votes. That said, I don’t see any issue with moving to a 2 year term as long as people can resign. I also don’t mind a 1 year term, it really doesn’t matter, but I mildly support 2 year terms as it reduces operational overhead. RE: Reduce qualification threshold no_entryI don’t support reducing qualifications. I don’t see why we would make th u… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-ratification-of-security-council-election-process-improvements/31048)._