[CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router

[Hawheik]

I’m voting “For” this proposal with the understanding that the inclusion of this into the router doesn’t introduce any security risks.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that I consider USDS/sUSDS in itself good or bad, trustworthy or not, I see those kinds of considerations as mostly separate from the question as to whether we should enable seamless access to the infrastructure of Arbitrum for users.

Seconding the suggestions throughout the thread to allow one of the Arbitrum Aligned Entities to take on the task of making these decision in the future. This seems like a prime candidate for a DAO policy to be set and then applied by an AAE, with the assumption that we want to enable infra access broadly and don’t want to arbitrate the advantages/disadvantages of every single token as a DAO.

[Tally_Support]

Voting has ended!
===============
[[CONSTITUTIONAL] Register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9/proposal/2616193137172809132)

### Final Votes

| **Category**         | **Result**       | **Details**                 |
|----------------------|------------------|-----------------------------|
| **Quorum reached**   | ✅ | 234.71M of 222.41M         |
| **Majority Support** | ✅ |                             |
| **For**              |                  | 217.67M (92.7%)    |
| **Against**          |                  | 27.23k (0.0%) |
| **Abstain**          |                  | 17.04M (7.3%) |

* * *
I am a bot. Questions? Contact support@tally.xyz

[olimpio]

I have voted FOR in the Tally vote, for the same reasons as below:

@olimpio

I voted FOR in favour of the proposal. Sky’s launch of USDS and sUSDS on Arbitrum is a win for both Arbitrum and Sky. Adding the Sky Custom Gateways for USDS and sUSDS to the Arbitrum Bridge UI will ensure users receive the official token versions and enjoy an experience as seamless as bridging other tokens. In addition, since Sky Custom Gateways are designed to handle new tokens or upgrades in the future, it should benefit both Arbitrum and Sky long-term. With Spark’s upcoming launch of Spark Liquidity Layer and Spark Savings, this could draw more users and activity to Arbitrum. Those users may rely on the Arbitrum Bridge UI, so it would be beneficial if those users did not face any complications. There are no direct additional costs associated with the implementation, the audits by ChainSecurity and Cantina (with no issues found/only 2 informational findings), and formal verification by Certora; I do not see any reason to be against this proposal.