[CONSTITUTIONAL] Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway

[Sinkas]

The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst, @Sinkas, and @Manugotsuka, and it’s based on their combined research, fact-checking, and ideation.

We are voting FOR the proposal.

We previously supported the proposal during the temp-check, and we are extending our support to the onchain vote as well. The most important part of this vote, as we also stated previously, is to figure out how to handle these registrations. To that end, we’ve created a working group that aims to address the situation.

[maxlomu]

gm, VOTED in favor as per previous rationale.

[Tally_Support]

Onchain voting for this proposal is ending within 24 hours:
[Vote on Tally: [CONSTITUTIONAL] Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9/proposal/2646816212452902696)
* * *
I am a bot. Questions? Contact support@tally.xyz

[Tally_Support]

Voting has ended!
===============
[[CONSTITUTIONAL] Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/eip155:42161:0xf07DeD9dC292157749B6Fd268E37DF6EA38395B9/proposal/2646816212452902696)

### Final Votes

| **Category**         | **Result**       | **Details**                 |
|----------------------|------------------|-----------------------------|
| **Quorum reached**   | ✅ | 213.04M of 204.86M         |
| **Majority Support** | ✅ |                             |
| **For**              |                  | 212.95M (99.9%)    |
| **Against**          |                  | 42.11k (0.0%) |
| **Abstain**          |                  | 89.48k (0.0%) |

* * *
I am a bot. Questions? Contact support@tally.xyz

[jameskbh]

I voted FOR, and the reasoning remains the same.

[paulofonseca]

voted For on this past offchain vote because we need a simpler process for this kind of thing.

[paulofonseca]

voted For on this onchain vote because this should have been done much earlier.