# Cp0x Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [March 6, 2024, 6:48pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cp0x-delegate-communication-thread/22217 "2024-03-06T18:48:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 227
**Author:** ![cp0x](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/cp0x/32/5455_2.png) [@cp0x](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/cp0x)\ **Post date:** [February 6, 2026, 12:48pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cp0x-delegate-communication-thread/22217/227 "2026-02-06T12:48:47Z")
# [[Constitutional] AIP: DVP Quorum](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xc5f06144fa92aaff99e0e44482ab6f7a3f6486dfb6c854d16271399ffcf895e6) * * * > [@\[Constitutional\] DVP Quorum for ArbitrumDAO: Implementation & Parameters](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao-implementation-parameters/30484/14): > > I voted Against As I mentioned earlier, I’m sure this decision will lead to: apathy in voting (there’s no need to put in the effort if the top 13 delegates provide a quorum) due to apathy - centralization (this is bad, since a small number of delegates control a huge community) instead of incentivizing voting, a simpler method of reducing the quorum is chosen every time (in the eight months since the DVP idea was voted on, no other coefficient options have been proposed) * * * Vote: **AGAINST** Platform: Snapshot --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cp0x-delegate-communication-thread/22217)._