# Curia Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [May 2, 2024, 9:11am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600 "2024-05-02T09:11:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 31

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Curia](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/curia/32/7751_2.png) [@Curia](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Curia)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2025, 4:42am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600/31 "2025-07-15T04:42:44Z")

</div>

**Proposal:** [[Constitutional] AIP: Update the Upgrade Executors](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-update-the-upgrade-executors/29463/12)

**Vote:** For

**Rationale:** We support this proposal as it streamlines the DAO’s upgrade process by introducing `executeCall()` , allowing for direct contract upgrades without deploying separate upgrade contracts. This improves efficiency, reduces complexity, and maintains backward compatibility. With the code already audited and no added governance risk, we see this as a low-risk, high-value improvement to DAO operations.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600)._
