# Curia Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600
**Category:** Delegate Statements
**Tags:** delegation, governance, delegate-statements
**Created:** [May 2, 2024, 9:11am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600 "2024-05-02T09:11:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Curia](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/curia/32/7751_2.png) [@Curia](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Curia)
#### Post date: [June 9, 2024, 1:09pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600/5 "2024-06-09T13:09:06Z")

</div>

**Proposal:** [MUX STIP Bridge Challenge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-mux-protocol-stip-addendum/23726/6)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** Despite previous funding, the incentives did not lead to sustainable, long-term activity as indicated by the metrics. Therefore, additional funding is not justified.

**Proposal:** [Stargate STIP Bridge Challenge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-stargate-finance-stip-addendum/23743)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** Funding this proposal will benefit users who wish to bridge to Arbitrum, thus we support this initiative.

**Proposal:** [Solv STIP Bridge Challenge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-solv-protocol-stip-addendum/23759)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** The previous round statistics have shown continuous growth; continued funding will likely sustain this progress

**Proposal:** [Sanko GameCorp STIP Bridge Challenge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/sanko-gamecorp-stip-addendum/23765)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** TVL and daily user growth have been continuous, so we decide to support further funding

**Proposal:** [Tide STIP Bridge Challenge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tide-protocol-stip-addendum/23804)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** The data does not clearly demonstrate significant engagement for the previous round, so we decided to reject funding.

**Proposal:** [KyberSwap STIP Bridge Challenge](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-kyberswap-stip-addendum/23801)

**Vote:** Abstain

**Rationale:** Due to a recent security breach and the lack of performance indicators, further funding is not prudent at this time.

**Proposal:** [Gains Network STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-gains-network-stip-addendum/23398/1)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** The metrics seem to indicate the the incentives isn’t creating sustainable, long-term activity for it. Hence, we decided to reject funding.

**Proposal:** [Boost (Prev. RabbitHole) STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/boost-prev-rabbithole-stip-addendum/23515/1)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** The metrics do not show sustainable long-term activity, making further funding unproductive.

**Proposal:** [Thales Protocol STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/thales-protocol-stip-addendum/23424)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** Metrics seem to indicate growth past the STIPP timeframe

**Proposal:** [Savvy DAO STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/savvy-dao-stip-addendum/23337/6)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** The number of requests is too much compared to TVL.

**Proposal:** [Stake DAO STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/stake-dao-stip-addendum/23392)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** the metric provided a positive outcome for the number of request, we decided to vote approve funding

**Proposal:** [Furucombo STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-furucombo-stip-addendum/23599/5)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** Concerns about wash trading are significant, and additional funding is not justified until these issues are resolved.

**Proposal:** [Socket Bridge STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-socket-bridge-addendum/23601/3)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** lack of reporting and funds still available from original STIPP

**Proposal:** [Angle DAO STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-angle-stip-bridge-addendum/23627)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** Insufficient growth metrics to predict the cost

**Proposal:** [OpenOcean STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/openocean-stip-addendum/23470/3)

**Vote:** Reject funding

**Rationale:** There is not much post-STIPP activity, indicating that further funding is unlikely to achieve long-term engagement.

**Proposal:** [Thetanuts Finance STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/thetanuts-finance-stip-addendum/23374)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** The statistics make sense for the number of requests, and metrics show that it continuously grew during the STIP.

**Proposal:** [Dolomite STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dolomite-stip-addendum/23582)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** they have a strong performance in the first round of STIP. so we decided to support

**Proposal:** [Umami Finance STIP Addendum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/final-umami-finance-stip-addendum/23493/3)

**Vote:** Approve funding

**Rationale:** after clarification from Neotokyocat, we decided to vote support them, as the incentivization method has proven effective, and the proposal has demonstrated success

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/curia-delegate-communication-thread/23600)._