Curia Forum Score Integration: Measuring Delegate Engagement Beyond Voting

[paulofonseca]

@Curia

For example, the SeedGov team—who are also delegates—run the Delegate Incentive Program, evaluate delegate performance, and publish their methodology, inviting community input to ensure neutrality.

That’s not a fair comparison. If SeedGov were paying themselves as if they were a delegate participating in the DIP, then it would be a fair comparison. But there’s a reason why SeedGov is not scoring themselves on the DIP criteria, right?

But my main issue is regarding the fragmentation of delegate information across several platforms (Snapshot, Tally, Karma, and now Curia) without that information being onchain (and no, not behind an API) and publicly accessible to everyone else, so that it is truly composable.

That’s why I commented in this other post with

@paulofonseca

I believe that this type of delegate information (Name, Profile Picture, Forum account, Delegate Statement, etc), should be as open and composable as possible, which means that it should be onchain.