I support this proposal. A few things worth noting is the commitment shown by the team to the Arbitrum ecosystem, while also having experience and exposure to the expectations and feedback from Tradfi. The project appears to keep much of the activity and strategies within the Arbitrum ecosystem and not only seeks to increases TVL and liquidity for Dsquared, but also for GMX and Camelot. As vaults and strategies are implemented, it seems it would apply to more projects.The project also appears to focus on Arbitrum native platforms for its options trading strategy with the intent of meeting return expectations of Crypto native and Tradfi. In this current environment, I think its important to take a harder look at institutional adoption. This is not only for increased capital into the Arbitrum ecosystem, but provides education and use cases for institutional money and potentially regulators to consider. I think the space is maturing overall and appealing to different subgroups are important for the space to continue growing.I did notice a comment about an internal dispute amongst the team that resulted in a pause. I understand that as a consideration. However, the ability to resolve a dispute and continue forward with a resolution instead of closing shop is an accomplishment in itself during the depths of a bear market. I think this dedication redirected to advancing the project within the Arbitrum ecosystem is further evidence of the need to support the project.
5 Likes