# DAOplomats Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [April 27, 2023, 5:13pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/daoplomats-delegate-communication-thread/14165 "2023-04-27T17:13:52Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![WinVerse](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/winverse/32/10523_2.png) [@WinVerse](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/WinVerse)\ **Post date:** [June 30, 2024, 9:02pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/daoplomats-delegate-communication-thread/14165/17 "2024-06-30T21:02:05Z")
## [Tally] [Front-end Interface to Force Transaction Inclusion During Sequencer Downtime](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/36935952286774715100281528276901040748078989679883088545641375212318446360822) **Voted: For** We were happy to [support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tally-front-end-interface-to-force-transaction-inclusion-during-sequencer-downtime/21247/70) this proposal during the onchain vote as it provides a quick fix during sequencer downtimes. ## [Snapshot] [Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x285a0ef00fabce6e1d44b10ffff9fff5a30f62649339cfeded113e23bc58cdf1) **Voted: Against** The ADPC was [willing](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-set-up-a-sub-committee-for-the-security-services-subsidy-fund/23766/24) to take on this responsibility so there was no need — at least right now — to create this sub-committee. ## [Snapshot] [AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4ad37b12ffe5c334e0c19113ac54222983e18d36a255fbde60e483592f35fc65) **Voted: For** This proposal will automate the transfer process of funds accrued from transaction fees on Nova to the DAO’s treasury. We were happy to [support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-nova-fee-router-proposal-arbos-30/23310/22) it. ## [Tally] [Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4ad37b12ffe5c334e0c19113ac54222983e18d36a255fbde60e483592f35fc65) **Voted: Against** We [weren’t in support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/catalyze-gaming-ecosystem-growth-on-arbitrum/22368/209) of the requested funding and the projected timeline for deliverables. ## [Snapshot] [AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x330ed0f609da63cf4b67b932ab0665a76e1c7d6a7789f3383339bad79c789d2b) **Voted: For** Interoperability, preferred languages, and more. It was an easy [yes](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-activate-stylus-and-enable-next-gen-webassembly-smart-contracts-arbos-30/22970/37) for us. ## [Snapshot] [AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x2f73825f375d59a5d3c8b05074e17140a4967e6ccb6fe20a58f836f865fcaae5) **Voted: For** A healthy user security improvement. This was a welcome initiative we were happy to [support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-support-rip-7212-for-account-abstraction-wallets-arbos-30/23298/35). ## [Tally] [Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/108365944612843449282647711225577270624871742641825297712833904029381791489297) **Voted: For** We were in [favor](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-security-council-improvement-proposal/20541/34) of increasing the number of seats to 9/12. ## [Tally] [ArbitrumDAO Contribution; Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/38701323908152171422214887490453506732497504710759730413296983575898180294585) **Voted: For** We were happy to support this proposal during the temp check and [now](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-non-constitutional-defending-open-source-a-united-stand-for-developer-rights-and-software-freedom/23047/57) during the onchain vote. ## [Snapshot] [Election of STEP Program Manager](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x991f18a73526fb5715b41e37f7460ced511c02cf3470d41cdaf97656c794406b) **Voted: 100% for Steakhouse** They are very knowledgeable on RWA monitoring and have dipped their feet in the Arbitrum waters, offering services to several protocols within Arbitrum so we were happy to [support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/step-program-manager-applications/23390/30) them. ## [Snapshot] [[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x09d16f8726f1f9a85bd6975587947a2cd7ce6bd438750d52866ae36207ac7ded) **Voted: For [No IRL Event]** We were generally in [support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-phase-arbitrum-venture-initiative/24247/54) of this initiative but against funding the IRL event. ## [Snapshot] [AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x98a2b1eebda641b31d7d22a60708840ec7899157e00a4028f2e9f3030ddaf7a8) **Voted: For (in all three proposals)** As we look to achieving Stage 2, we were pleased to [support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-bold-permissionless-validation-for-arbitrum/23232/69) this upgrade along with associated bond and op cost sentiment. ## [Snapshot] [Pilot Stage – Treasury Backed Vaults research and development](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xa220a80bf17a91c1c67b2c9de430ba0349c5122413644e1df49d34d19c1413bb) **Voted: Against** While the proposal shows promise, we believe the Snapshot vote was rushed and were generally [against](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-pilot-stage-treasury-backed-vaults-research-and-development/24692/66) it as is. ## [Snapshot] [[Non-Constitutional] Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xb57f04ac3afb432ddbc7d4426f80bdca9191e56bee97cf5b7d9d55cd9fdf9752) **Voted: Against** It is definitely a good initiative. However, we had some [concerns](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/betting-on-builders-infinite-launchpad-proposal/24665/44) and this potentially resulted in us voting against. ## [Tally] [Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/79183200449169085571205208154003416944507585311666453826890708127615057369177) **Voted: Abstain** We [maintained](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/kwenta-x-perennial-arbitrum-onboarding-incentives-updated/22736/62) our vote from the temp check sighting the same rationale we had with Curve. ## [Snapshot] [ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x2af945c5c65a4904e5c3f92be99aef47dc36aacfa2b64c61cf03e7f2a0a45b94) **Voted: Against** We strongly [resonated](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-arbitrumhub-evolution-the-next-step-in-streamlining-information-access-and-raising-awareness-for-arbitrum-dao/24857/46) with the concern from delegates regarding the proposed cost so we voted against this proposal in its current form. ## [Snapshot] [Multisig Support Service (MSS) Elections](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4f6f6c1ba11de1122d5d5b8b098999610920fdc9c61a5e775ea09fbb4bdffc1b) There were several qualified candidates so we decided to go with those with experience in Arbitrum and those we have been involved with in some degree both in Arbitrum and across other DAOs. They were: - Limes.eth - Griff Green - JoJo - Alex “Slobo.eth” Slobodnik - Feems - Sinkas - Disruption Joe - Frisson - DAOplomats --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/daoplomats-delegate-communication-thread/14165)._