# DAOplomats Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\ **Created:** [April 27, 2023, 5:13pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/daoplomats-delegate-communication-thread/14165 "2023-04-27T17:13:52Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 21
**Author:** ![WinVerse](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/winverse/32/10523_2.png) [@WinVerse](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/WinVerse)\ **Post date:** [August 6, 2024, 10:27am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/daoplomats-delegate-communication-thread/14165/21 "2024-08-06T10:27:55Z")
## [Snapshot] [Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xfd4085bda4daaa79445627ac2886656cdc1ef90cfbe0e8b82f955773cbfd4290) **Voted: 33.3% each for Coinflip (Gov), David Bolger (BD) and Karthik Raju (Venture)** We would have preferred to abstain but [we did support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gcp-council-nominations/25093/50) the individuals we feel are best suited for those positions. ## [Snapshot] [Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x3161a3d9486ab7b6099be9fda16d6498f329249c0ad33b0f75090f2ceb557789) **Voted: Do not Fund** We agree Entropy has been great for the Arbitrum DAO but we [couldn’t support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-arbitrum-dao/25246/71) this proposal because of its cost. ## [Snapshot] [[Non-constitutional] Incentives Detox Proposal](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x99b57df3577e8e6561f3549b057bd87fdb7e66f65a7c45fddf63d9cd62f993d8) **Voted: FOR** We [were supportive](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-incentives-detox-proposal/25849/43) of taking a break from incentives to really dial in on learnings. This would in turn help finetune future incentive programs we would run. ## [Snapshot] [ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xb581f3aed701ae889c1d79406acdf3d653e6eb4323cb5e46635f729e6313da4d) **Voted: FOR** ARB Staking unlocks various possibilities with the ARB governance token and the future of staking rewards. We [supported this initiative](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arb-staking-unlock-arb-utility-and-align-governance/25084/131) by voting in favor during the temp check. ## [Snapshot] [Transparency and Standardized Metrics for Orbit Chains](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xd54c3dd8f27a9baef80c92189e63f06a6cb905e296be0b55dfaa8835a3b75127) **Voted: FOR** We believe the metrics growthepie would be producing would be quite valuable for the DAO, so we [supported this proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-transparency-and-standardized-metrics-for-orbit-chains-on-growthepie-xyz-allowing-data-driven-decision-making/25911/41) during the temp check. ## [Snapshot] [ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x573c74706924ce482080ba44deb77d75e8d6bdb516fbbdee54b78861c1683f1b) **Voted: FOR** We [were in favor](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrumdao-governance-analytics-dashboard/25869/43) of this proposal as we believe this governance dashboard would make more critical governance analysis available for the DAO. ## [Tally] [[Constitutional] ArbOS 31 “Bianca” (Stylus, RIP-7212 Support, Nova Fee Router)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/108288822474129076868455956066667369439381709547570289793612729242368710728616) **Voted: FOR** We supported all the upgrades during the temp check and [maintained that stance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/aip-arbos-31-bianca-activation-of-arbitrum-stylus-rip-7212-support-nova-fee-router-proposal/25904/24) for the onchain vote. ## [Tally] [Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/47904929527582233304785161920776863155691990219898799848510210794906211250836) **Voted: FOR** We [maintained our stance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rfc-arbitrum-multi-sig-support-service-mss/23737/80) from Snapshot, voting in favor during the onchain vote. ## [Snapshot] [Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes?](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x24188af307bee6ce66d10394d03d501746b343a686d64806ee71954e317ed382) **Voted: For Elections Only** Implementing this should serve as a good experimentation so [we voted to use shielded voting for elections only at this point](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/should-the-dao-default-to-using-shielded-voting-for-snapshot-votes/25884/54). ## [Snapshot] [Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x0e646ace733f4a098ac7036dbadad8465ea65c8e3c485e014501d41b7b439d87) **Voted: FOR** We [supported this temporary incentive extension](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-to-temporary-extend-delegate-incentive-system/26179/37) as we have been pleased with the positive effect of this initiative so far and would love to see it continue. ## [Snapshot] [ArbitrumDAO Off-site](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x21a4ec3fd338fa4eb2230d0e6131d1411639d94cf1b27864c9a3c1c722568c08) **Voted: FOR** This is a good experimentation and one [we were happy to support](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrumdao-off-site/25660/48) during the temp check. ## [Snapshot] [An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x04971448620419df86ea930d3f4ae75ad4fff2ebcaead84687a27475f00e24d5) **Voted: AGAINST** This proposal didn’t follow the right governance procedures so [we voted against it](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/team-6-an-eip-4824-powered-daouri-for-the-arbitrum-dao/25371/45). ## [Snapshot] [Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x4aa15fd4e3f8f4b270007186a76c1c79f7d3f8a4ae27f6d528666840d8cd477d) **Voted: AGAINST** This is a good proposal but we would love to see an RFP process around it before moving forward. Thus, [we voted against it](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/strategic-treasury-management-on-arbitrum/25301/73) during temp check. ## [Snapshot] [Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies?](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xbbec2fbf891d9abb21e8be380f79806519df8294d1d2cdce155d105fd1fed8db) **Voted: FOR: Strict Self-voting Policy** We supported the creation of these policies but leaned towards a [strict self-voting policy during the temp check vote](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/should-the-dao-create-coi-self-voting-policies/26062/37) as we believe that would be much more healthy for the DAO. ## [Tally] [Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/22562217031893796518849144396978331510254494883851105730012486117405397295942) **Voted: AGAINST** We [maintained our stance](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/entropy-advisors-exclusively-working-with-arbitrum-dao/25246/87) from Snapshot, voting against during the onchain vote. ## [Snapshot] [Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship](https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x29c7eb60e1ed122f81aa5f4caeb5d171b27ae644666ad18aece78ff28d7b9245) **Voted: Panda Partners** We were [happy to support this attackathon](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/ethereum-protocol-attackathon-sponsorship/26122/47) as panda partners as we believe security is important and we are generally in favor of initiatives that benefit the Ethereum ecosystem. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/daoplomats-delegate-communication-thread/14165)._