Thank you for taking the time to update the proposal based on feedback from the other thread. I don’t think my two questions in the original thread were ever addressed before it was locked, so copy + pasting here (Boosting DAO Efficiency by 10x: Aligning Accountability & Increasing Throughput - #23 by Bob-Rossi).
- Pretty much everything you listed as problem areas I agree with. I’ve either experienced them myself or have had discussions with builders who echo similar sentiment. It’s unfortunate these issues still exist, as I know it’s been discussed for a while and different attempts have been made to resolve them. I’ve historically been supportive of any initiative that tries to resolve this, as I’ve gotten to the point of ‘throw enough crap to see what sticks’.
- You mentioned a monthly governance call… what extra value would this add beyond the bi-weekly calls & monthly call already in place with the DAO?
- As a though exercise, what would you have done to prevent this from happening had you been in this role earlier this year (Proposal for Financial Restitution For ArbitrumDAO Grant Winners )? This is just one example, but in my experience some of the roadblocks were seeing aren’t anything the DAO can necessarily control.
I’ll add a brainstormy-type question here: In the event the entire proposal does not pass, is there willingness to fund a smaller amount to get some of the smaller projects accomplished? I can see something like building a Governance Wiki or the Tracking system could add value to the DAO.