# Designing and Operating the Reporting and Information Function

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Created:** [November 22, 2024, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609 "2024-11-22T04:35:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xAlex](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0xalex/32/5325_2.png) [@0xAlex](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0xAlex)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2024, 6:39am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609/25 "2024-12-03T06:39:04Z")

</div>

Thank you, @AlexLumley. As a new delegate in the Arbitrum DAO, I greatly value initiatives like the GRC meeting and its tracker, which provide a macro overview of ongoing activities. In my view, this proposal moves in the right direction, but I have a few concerns:

- As mentioned by other delegates, the budget seems to be on the high side compared to industry standards plus I am not sure to get the rationale for the bonus
- The proposal could be streamlined, for instance, by removing the advisory committee
- Could there be potential overlap with the future OpCo? In my opinion, this entity’s role is also to provide an overview of the DAO’s key projects so would like to understand how this could theroretically work

Based on these points, for now I am voting _Against_ this proposal but am open to reconsidering if these points are addressed in the future.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609)._