# Designing and Operating the Reporting and Information Function

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609>\
**Category:** Archived Proposals\
**Created:** [November 22, 2024, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609 "2024-11-22T04:35:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 37

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paulofonseca](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/paulofonseca/32/15551_2.png) [@paulofonseca](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/paulofonseca)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2024, 7:36am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609/37 "2024-12-04T07:36:15Z")

</div>

deleting the snapshot proposal is an irreversible action. I don’t think we should do that because that means the 4185 votes already casted would be lost. if the proposal was put up to a vote, it should be voted on, reach it’s end date, and we should learn from its result. we should not get into the habit of deleting snapshot proposals. I think there was only one other time a snapshot proposal was deleted in Arbitrum DAO, and it was this one: [[Non-Constitutional] Thank ARB by Plurality Labs - Milestone 2: Scaling Value Creation in the DAO - #32 by olimpio](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-thank-arb-by-plurality-labs-milestone-2-scaling-value-creation-in-the-dao/20534/32)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/designing-and-operating-the-reporting-and-information-function/27609)._