# \[DIP v1.51a\] Delegate Incentive Program Results (January 2025) **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Incentives Program (DIP)\ **Created:** [February 19, 2025, 11:11pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494 "2025-02-19T23:11:37Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![Larva](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/larva/32/1896_2.png) [@Larva](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Larva)\ **Post date:** [February 20, 2025, 2:07am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494/2 "2025-02-20T02:07:41Z")
Title: Dispute Larva Hey @SEEDGov, looks like my FD score is 0. Can you please tell me why all four of my feedbacks below are invalid? This will help me progress, thanks! > [@Proposal: Arbitrum Sponsorship at RWA Paris 2025](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/proposal-arbitrum-sponsorship-at-rwa-paris-2025/28086/2): > > Thank you for this proposal. Could you please provide a detailed explanation of the Breakfast Privatization? Is it a venue rented for Arbitrum to host activities, or is it that Arbitrum has purchased one or more tickets to participate in the breakfast? Additionally, I would like to confirm if Steven Goldfeder has already confirmed his attendance and speech. Are his travel expenses included in the budget outlined in this proposal? > [@\[Non-Constitutional\] DePolis, collective sensemaking for Arbitrum DAO](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-depolis-collective-sensemaking-for-arbitrum-dao/28076/2): > > Thank you for this proposal. I find it very interesting, and I have a few questions that I hope can be clarified further. 1.Purpose of Polis Is the goal of Polis to replace the current Forum? If so, will the data accumulated on the Forum over the past two years be migrated to Polis? If not, how will Polis avoid requiring Delegates to repeat discussions that have already taken place on the Forum? Additionally, what mechanisms will ensure effective collaboration between the two platforms? 2.Lon… > [@Arbitrum Independent Trench Operative](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-independent-trench-operative/28056/2): > > Thank you for your attention and support for Arbitrum DAO. I believe your intentions are good. However, as an OG in the Arbitrum ecosystem, I find it surprising that none of the thousands of people I follow are following you, and your latest post has only 14 views. It’s hard for me to believe you have any real influence. If you genuinely want to contribute to building Arbitrum, why not achieve some tangible results first and then apply for funding support? Particularly the feedback on ArbitrumHub’s proposal, which I think inspired both the sponsors and the delegates. > [@Non-Constitutional: Proposal for Piloting Enhancements and Strengthening the Sustainability of ArbitrumHub in the Year Ahead](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-proposal-for-piloting-enhancements-and-strengthening-the-sustainability-of-arbitrumhub-in-the-year-ahead/28055/2): > > Happy new year ser! Thank you for your continuous improvements to the proposal. Regardless of the outcome, this attitude of addressing feedback from the DAO deserves respect from everyone. This latest version of the proposal addresses my primary concern, which was the difference between ArbitrumHub and the Arbitrum Foundation’s official website, and it explains the necessity of ArbitrumHub’s existence. That said, I still have some suggestions for the latest version of the proposal. First, I b… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494)._