# \[DIP v1.51a\] Delegate Incentive Program Results (January 2025)

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494>\
**Category:** Delegate Incentives Program (DIP)\
**Created:** [February 19, 2025, 11:11pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494 "2025-02-19T23:11:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Argonaut](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/argonaut/32/11832_2.png) [@Argonaut](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Argonaut)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2025, 3:07pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494/7 "2025-02-20T15:07:30Z")

</div>

Title: Dispute

User name: Argonaut

Reason for dispute: Hello @SeedGov, our team was surprised to see that we didn’t receive any points for our feedback. For that reason, we would like to understand the reasons behind this. Specifically, we would like to know why these comments were not considered:

- [[Non-constitutional][RFC] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols - #6 by Argonaut](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-rfc-arb-incentives-user-acquisition-for-dapps-protocols/28291/6)
- [[Non-Constitutional] DePolis, collective sensemaking for Arbitrum DAO - #4 by Argonaut](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-depolis-collective-sensemaking-for-arbitrum-dao/28076/4)

Looking forward to your response.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dip-v1-51a-delegate-incentive-program-results-january-2025/28494)._