# Double-Down on STIP Successes (STIP-Bridge)

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/double-down-on-stip-successes-stip-bridge/22353>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [March 12, 2024, 1:26am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/double-down-on-stip-successes-stip-bridge/22353 "2024-03-12T01:26:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 29

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![maxlomu](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/maxlomu/32/1282_2.png) [@maxlomu](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/maxlomu)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2024, 3:45pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/double-down-on-stip-successes-stip-bridge/22353/29 "2024-03-19T15:45:50Z")

</div>

Thanks @pedrob and @cp0x @axlvaz_SEEDLATAM.eth for writing a very comprehensive answer, completely agree with your thoughts.

I think the LTIP is the way forward, and this should be the time to **demonstrate the results, achievement of product-market fit, liquidity stickiness** for projects that have already benefitted from ARB incentives.

I don’t think all projects were successful in their actions, so I don’t believe all of them should be granted further incentives from the DAO.  
I won’t be able to support this proposal until we have some clarity on this (and a [sybyl report](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/openblock-labs-stip-efficacy-sybil-analysis-2-24/21441/6) cannot be enough).

The incentives should be used to prove that a protocol can use a not-infinite amount of money to attract **and retain** value on Arbitrum.  
Reminder: there will always be a new L2 that can offer more shiny incentives.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/double-down-on-stip-successes-stip-bridge/22353)._