# Dragonfly Delegate Communication Thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Created:** [October 2, 2024, 1:20pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dragonfly-delegate-communication-thread/27011 "2024-10-02T13:20:43Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 17
**Author:** ![Dragonfly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Dragonfly](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Dragonfly)\ **Post date:** [March 9, 2025, 9:25am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dragonfly-delegate-communication-thread/27011/17 "2025-03-09T09:25:35Z")
Snapshot - [TMC Recommendation](https://snapshot.box/#/s:arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xc37793b67f39a6af9e9434003205b1d9b67dd6f75638329045257be823da4f18) Voted for the stable strategies, and against ARB strategies. Mentioned my reasons here: > [@TMC’s Proposed Allocations](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tmc-s-proposed-allocations/28522/41): > > I support the lead of the commission and will be voting in favor of the stable strategy without supporting the Arbitrum ones. I believe we have strong providers for the stable options. Would like to highlight that if there wasn’t a suitable strategy for ARB, it’s possible that the risk guidelines weren’t clear enough for the protocols that applied. > > I’m looking forward to having the cash account for the DAO with the ARB fluctuation, as it will make things much easier for us. > > The only thing I don’t understand is why we used ranked-choice voting for this decision since it seems to overcomplicate things unnecessarily. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dragonfly-delegate-communication-thread/27011)._