# DVP-Quorum for ArbitrumDAO

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao/29996>\
**Category:** Technical Discussion\
**Created:** [September 19, 2025, 3:02pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao/29996 "2025-09-19T15:02:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![krst](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/krst/32/1357_2.png) [@krst](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/krst)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2025, 1:09pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao/29996/22 "2025-10-16T13:09:37Z")

</div>

Cross-posting our opinion on DVP here as well for visibility:

> [@\[Constitutional\] AIP: DVP Quorum](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-dvp-quorum/30053/21):
>
> The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Manugotsuka, and is based on their combined research, fact-checking, and ideation. We voted AGAINST. While the current quorum model needs improvement, we are not convinced that this proposal is the right solution for the identified issues. First, it does not address the underlying issue of tokenholders not delegating their tokens to participate in governance. I recall that this issue was raised during a DAO m…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dvp-quorum-for-arbitrumdao/29996)._