# DZack23.eth Delegate Communications thread **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegate Statements\ **Created:** [December 12, 2025, 7:17pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dzack23-eth-delegate-communications-thread/30340 "2025-12-12T19:17:25Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 6
**Author:** ![dzack23](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/dzack23/32/746_2.png) [@dzack23](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/dzack23)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2026, 5:41pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dzack23-eth-delegate-communications-thread/30340/6 "2026-02-10T17:41:54Z")
In favor of adding proposal cancellation affordance to governance contract: > [@Change to New Governance Contracts that Allow Proposal Cancellation](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/change-to-new-governance-contracts-that-allow-proposal-cancellation/27531/50): > > Voting in Favor — allowing the proposal submitter to cancel (during the 3-day delegation period) is a strict win, accounting for e.g. human-error cases caught after proposal submission. It also gives the Security Council a cleaner means of canceling proposals if need be. Point of clarification: the Security Council already has the affordance to cancel proposals; it could be done, e.g., via a proxy-upgrade of the governance contract. This proposal only lets the SC do so in a way that is technic… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dzack23-eth-delegate-communications-thread/30340)._