# Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/enhancing-multichain-governance-upgrading-rari-governance-token-on-arbitrum/26096>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [August 5, 2024, 12:55pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/enhancing-multichain-governance-upgrading-rari-governance-token-on-arbitrum/26096 "2024-08-05T12:55:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 49

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![krst](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/krst/32/1357_2.png) [@krst](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/krst)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2024, 10:26am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/enhancing-multichain-governance-upgrading-rari-governance-token-on-arbitrum/26096/49 "2024-10-04T10:26:23Z")

</div>

The following reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.

We’re voting FOR this proposal just like [we signaled we’d do](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/enhancing-multichain-governance-upgrading-rari-governance-token-on-arbitrum/26096/39) when we voted for it during temp-check.

The [security review conducted by the ARDC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/rari-multichain-governance-proposal-security-review/26648) didn’t raise any issues with the proposed implementation, which could have potentially changed our decision based on severity.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/enhancing-multichain-governance-upgrading-rari-governance-token-on-arbitrum/26096)._