# Expand Tally Support for the Arbitrum DAO

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/expand-tally-support-for-the-arbitrum-dao/22387>\
**Category:** Finalized AIPs\
**Created:** [March 13, 2024, 2:12am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/expand-tally-support-for-the-arbitrum-dao/22387 "2024-03-13T02:12:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 58

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bob-Rossi](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/bob-rossi/32/873_2.png) [@Bob-Rossi](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Bob-Rossi)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2024, 2:28am UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/expand-tally-support-for-the-arbitrum-dao/22387/58 "2024-04-05T02:28:50Z")

</div>

My opinion on the proposal is unchanged from the Snapshot vote, which can be found [above](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/expand-tally-support-for-the-arbitrum-dao/22387/34). I will be voting “For” this on Tally.

I appreciate the foresight of Frisson / Tally to continually look to improve the on-chain governance process. I really think any way we can make governance easier to participate in (both delegators and delegates) as well as more transparent is a win. I’ll also add that since the Snapshot vote Frisson has already setup the forum post for governance tooling ideas, which gives me confidence Tally understands the importance of these types of improvements. I look forward to what kind of tooling will come of this, both specific to Arbitrum’s DAO but also the trickle-down effects of other DAOs that may benefit.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/expand-tally-support-for-the-arbitrum-dao/22387)._