# Frisson Delegate Communication Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/frisson-delegate-communication-thread/24732>\
**Category:** Delegate Statements\
**Tags:** delegation, delegate-statements\
**Created:** [June 3, 2024, 10:14pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/frisson-delegate-communication-thread/24732 "2024-06-03T22:14:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 55

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frisson](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/frisson/32/2288_2.png) [@Frisson](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Frisson)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2024, 2:10pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/frisson-delegate-communication-thread/24732/55 "2024-10-09T14:10:17Z")

</div>

> [@Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/arbitrum-dao-procurement-committee-phase-ii-proposal/26441/85):
>
> I voted FOR this proposal on Tally for the reasons outlined below. I’m comfortable with the team’s approach of focusing on execution only for the events vertical to reduce scope. I still think it’s ambitious to tackle two verticals at once, but am willing to let it play out and observe the results. I’m fine with the re-election of the current ARDC members, as I think continuity will benefit execution.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/frisson-delegate-communication-thread/24732)._