# GMC's Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP **URL:** \ **Category:** Treasury Management v1.2 - GM Track (ETH)\ **Created:** [February 21, 2025, 11:14pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524 "2025-02-21T23:14:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 47
**Author:** ![0xAlex](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/0xalex/32/5325_2.png) [@0xAlex](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/0xAlex)\ **Post date:** [March 24, 2025, 6:13pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524/47 "2025-03-24T18:13:02Z")
I’m voting **FOR** this proposal because it utilizes proven, battle-tested protocols, and I’m particularly pleased with the inclusion of Camelot to bolster a native Arbitrum DeFi protocol. As I’ve noted before in [this comment](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967/23), I believe it would be worthwhile to also consider supporting Mainnet decentralization. While the perceived risk might appear greater, I think it would send a powerful message to the community that Arbitrum its in a symbiotic relationship with Ethereum and prioritizes it’s decentralization. One potential low risk approach could be to allocate a portion of the generated yield toward this specific goal. > [@\[Non-Constitutional\] Treasury Management v1.2](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/non-constitutional-treasury-management-v1-2/26967/23): > > To demonstrate alignment with Ethereum, it could be good to allocate ETH to some LSTs/LRTs that support minority Clients to avoid having one that represents \>66% of the total. You can learn more about this in [this tweet](https://x.com/JuanSamitier/status/1762917673787384256) from our Treasurer at Kleros Cooperative, Juan. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524)._