# GMC's Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524>\
**Category:** Treasury Management v1.2 - GM Track (ETH)\
**Created:** [February 21, 2025, 11:14pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524 "2025-02-21T23:14:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 49

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Griff](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/griff/32/964_2.png) [@Griff](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Griff)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2025, 8:36pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524/49 "2025-03-24T20:36:48Z")

</div>

**Voting YES.**

Letting 7,500 ETH sit idle is a waste—putting it to work in Lido and Aave makes sense.

These are battle-tested protocols with solid yields, and while I’d love to see more Arbitrum-native projects in the mix, Fluid and Camelot are good enough for experimenting, and we can push for other protocols in future rounds. No need to stall progress for politics when we can simply add more along the way.

More ETH will come.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524)._