# GMC's Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP

**URL:** <https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524>\
**Category:** Treasury Management v1.2 - GM Track (ETH)\
**Created:** [February 21, 2025, 11:14pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524 "2025-02-21T23:14:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 74

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Juanrah](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/forum.arbitrum.foundation/juanrah/32/10393_2.png) [@Juanrah](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/u/Juanrah)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2025, 5:40pm UTC](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524/74 "2025-03-27T17:40:18Z")

</div>

I am voting FOR in Snapshot. I believe the way this proposal is structured shows a balance between yield generation for ecosystem growth while maintaining a conservative approach.

The yields are relatively low but adequate for a low-risk profile.

My only concern would be on the lack of clarity around management procedures and exit strategies. Despite this, the benefits of putting these assets to productive use outweigh leaving them idle.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/gmcs-preferred-choices-for-7-500-eth-rfp/28524)._