I’ve already voted in favor of this proposal and @SavvyDAO will soon.
Team has been helpful to build with and they provide some of the best yields on Arbitrum. Impressed with their ability to consistently ship.
This proposal will provide plenty of value to the Savvy community.
From @Seedgov led by the @cattin delegation, we want to convey our support to this proposal. The reasons why we agree are as follows:
It fits within the requirements of its category.
The distribution makes sense in terms of the impact to be achieved. GMD as coverage for GLP and GM has gained traction and is likely to continue doing so as long as GMX does.
They include failure metrics to adjust the grant size based on KPIs.
We want to clarify that this is not the final vote, since as we clarify in this release, the final vote is defined by our community. We also want to invite you to attend our Governance Call that will be held tomorrow in our discord.
Firstly, we thank you for preparing such a detailed proposal. As previously mentioned by other members, one of our concerns is that the received grant will be used to create incentives through the project’s native tokens. However, we think that the grant amount you requested is acceptable for a native project like Arbitrum.
As ITU Blockchain, we are voting “For” on this proposal.